Hello Neighbors,

I also appreciate Frank’s thoughts and concerns. Given our nearly built-out community, the proposed fees and changes seem unnecessary. We should address road maintenance collectively when needed, as we are a small mountain community. The HOA should focus on maintaining the grounds and the gate. As property owners, we should take pride in our homes and landscaping and be held accountable for doing so. Excessive oversight can harm our community's vibe.

Late dues should incur fees after a grace period, which is standard. An ACC board adds value by ensuring Greystone’s vision, but approvals should be swift and without fees. I'm currently out of the country and will vote "No" on all suggested items. Requiring a notary for property owner votes also seems unneccessary. However, if required I will provide that when able if given a due date.

Hello,

Currently out of the country so providing a notarized vote via mail will not feasible, for the record I am not in favor of any of the proposed changes, my vote is “no” for all proposed amendments. There was a lot of interest in having a transparent vote, with numerous people voting “no” for all proposed changes. These individuals also took the time to voice their reasoning for their “no” vote. It appears this feedback has not been welcomed and a vote is still trying to be pushed through which is a bit concerning.

I am currently out of the country, so providing a notarized vote by mail is not feasible. I wish to state that I am not in favor of any proposed changes; my vote is "no" for all amendments. There was significant interest in conducting a transparent vote, with many individuals also voting "no" and articulating their reasons. It appears that this feedback has not been acknowledged, and there are ongoing efforts to proceed with the vote, which is concerning.

I support postponing this to allow all parties to collaboratively find a solution that better suits our small mountain community, as a neighbor previously mentioned. Greystone has been established for many years and is nearly fully developed, so delaying this should not pose any issues.

Hello everyone,

I am currently out of the country, so providing a notarized vote by mail is not feasible. I would like to express that I oppose all proposed changes; my vote is "no" for all amendments. There has been significant interest in conducting a transparent vote, with many individuals also voting "no" and sharing their reasons. However, it seems this feedback has not been acknowledged, and there are continuing efforts to proceed with the vote, which is concerning. I support postponing this matter to allow all parties to collaboratively find a solution that better serves our small mountain community, as a neighbor previously mentioned. Greystone has been established for many years and is nearly fully developed, so delaying this should not be an issue.

Hello everyone,

I am currently out of the country, which makes providing a notarized vote by mail unfeasible. I wish to clearly state my opposition to all proposed changes; my vote is "no" for each amendment.

There has been considerable interest in ensuring a transparent voting process, with many individuals also voting "no" and articulating their concerns. It appears that this feedback has not been adequately acknowledged, and there are ongoing efforts to advance the vote, which is troubling.

I advocate for postponing this matter to enable all parties to collaboratively seek a solution that better serves our small mountain community, as a neighbor previously suggested. Greystone has been successfully established for many years and is nearly fully developed; thus, a delay should not pose significant issues.

Thank you for your understanding.

Hello everyone,

I am currently out of the country, which makes providing a notarized vote by mail unfeasible. I wish to clearly state my opposition to all proposed changes; my vote is "no" for each amendment.

There has been considerable interest in ensuring a transparent voting process, with many individuals also voting "no" and articulating their concerns. Unless I overlooked a response to these concerns in my inbox, It appears that this feedback has not been adequately acknowledged, and there are ongoing efforts to advance the vote, which is troubling.

I advocate for postponing this matter to enable all parties to collaboratively seek a solution that better serves our small mountain community, as a neighbor previously suggested. Greystone has been successfully established for many years and is nearly fully developed; thus, a delay should not pose significant issues.

Thank you for your understanding.

Hello everyone,

I am currently out of the country, which makes providing a notarized vote by mail unfeasible. I want to clearly state my opposition to all proposed changes; my vote is "no" for each amendment.

There has been considerable interest in ensuring a transparent voting process, with many individuals also voting "no" and articulating their concerns. Unless I have overlooked a response to these concerns in my inbox, it appears that this feedback has not been adequately acknowledged. Moreover, there are ongoing efforts to advance the vote, which is troubling.

I advocate for postponing this matter to enable all parties to collaboratively seek a solution that better serves our small mountain community, as a neighbor previously suggested. Greystone has been successfully established for many years and is nearly fully developed; therefore, a delay should not pose significant issues.

Thank you for your understanding.

Hello BOD and Neighbors,

I am currently out of the country, which makes providing a notarized vote by mail unfeasible. I want to clearly state my opposition to all proposed changes; my vote is "no" for each amendment.

There has been considerable interest in ensuring a transparent voting process, with many individuals also voting "no" and articulating their concerns. Unless I have overlooked a response to these concerns in my inbox, it appears that this feedback has not been adequately acknowledged. Moreover, there are ongoing efforts to advance the vote, which is troubling.

I advocate for postponing this matter to enable all parties to collaboratively seek a solution that better serves our small mountain community, as a neighbor previously suggested. Greystone has been successfully established for many years and is nearly fully developed; therefore, a delay should not pose significant issues.

Moving forward I feel keeping things simple, having special assessments when additional funds are necessary for required projects like the road, etc. If the HOA could provide an invoice link to submit dues, that would allow for immediate payments and avoid any unnecessary mail delays. The HOAs main focus should continue to be that of maintaining the grounds and keeping the gate operational. We all moved into this small mountain community for a simpler way of living outside of the hustle and bustle.

Thank you for your understanding.

Dear Board of Directors and Neighbors,

I would like to take this opportunity to communicate my current situation and position regarding the proposed changes. As I am currently out of the country, providing a notarized vote by mail is not feasible. Therefore, I am writing to formally state my opposition to all proposed amendments. My vote is "no" for each of the proposed changes.

There has been significant interest in ensuring a transparent voting process, with numerous individuals also casting "no" votes and expressing their concerns. If I have missed any responses addressing these concerns in my inbox, it appears that this feedback has not been adequately acknowledged. Additionally, it is concerning to see ongoing efforts to advance the vote despite these substantial objections.

I strongly advocate for postponing this matter to allow all parties to collaboratively seek a solution that better serves our small mountain community, as previously suggested by a neighbor. Greystone has been successfully established for many years and is nearing full development; therefore, I believe that a delay should not present significant issues.

Moving forward, I feel it is essential to keep the process simple. Implementing special assessments when additional funds are needed for required projects, such as road maintenance, would be prudent. Furthermore, if the HOA could provide an invoice link for submitting dues, it would facilitate immediate payments and avoid unnecessary delays caused by mail.

The primary focus of the HOA should remain on maintaining the grounds and ensuring that the gate remains operational. We all chose to reside in this small mountain community for a simpler, more peaceful way of living, removed from the hustle and bustle.

Thank you for your understanding.

Jake.

Dear Board of Directors and Neighbors,

I am writing to express my opposition to all proposed amendments, as I am currently out of the country and unable to provide a notarized vote by mail. My vote stands at "no" for each of the proposed changes.

There is clearly a significant demand for a transparent voting process, with many individuals also voicing their opposition. If there are responses regarding these concerns that I have overlooked, I believe they have not been sufficiently acknowledged. It is concerning to witness continued efforts to advance the vote despite notable objections.

I strongly recommend postponing this matter to allow us to collaboratively find a solution that serves our small mountain community, as previously suggested by a neighbor. Greystone has been established successfully for many years and is nearing full development; therefore, I trust that a delay would not be overly problematic.

In the future, I advocate for a straightforward approach. Special assessments could be implemented when additional funds are necessary for projects like road maintenance. Additionally, providing an invoice link for dues payments would enhance efficiency and help avoid delays.

The core focus of the HOA should be on maintaining the grounds and ensuring that the gate remains functional. We chose to live in this community for its simplicity and peace, away from the complexities of urban life.

Thank you for your understanding.

Jake.

Dear Board of Directors and Neighbors,

I oppose all proposed amendments since I am out of the country and unable to vote by mail. My answer is "no" to each change.

There is a strong need for a clear voting process, and many people share my concerns. If there have been any responses that address these issues, they haven't been adequately acknowledged. It’s worrisome to see efforts to proceed with voting despite significant objections.

I suggest we postpone this matter to work together on a solution that benefits our mountain community, as a neighbor mentioned. Greystone has been successful for years and is close to full development; thus, I believe a delay won't cause major issues.

In the future, I propose a simple approach. We could apply special assessments when extra funds are needed for projects like road maintenance. Also, offering an invoice link for dues payments would improve efficiency and prevent delays.

The HOA's main focus should be maintaining the grounds and keeping the gate functional. We chose this community for its simplicity and tranquility, away from urban complexities.

Thank you for your understanding.
Jake